|
|
| Tell us what you think |
|
| Home |
|
Demographics and Health
Effects
Key findings,
Recommendations,
Slide kit |
|
Efficacy
Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research,
Slide kit |
|
Health Economics
Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research |
|
Policy
Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research,
Slide kit |
|
Safety
Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research,
Slide kit
|
|
| Resource library |
|
| Useful organisations |
|
| About Us |
|
| Funders |
|
|
|

Recommendations
- Cessation interventions (counseling and pharmacotherapy) should
be covered under both public and private health insurance
plans.
- In regions or countries where cost is a barrier to access,
effective population-based tobacco control interventions (e.g.
higher tobacco taxes, smoke-free policies) and low-cost
individual-level interventions (e.g. brief doctor’s advice,
counseling via phone, email, or chat rooms, the use of self-help
materials) should be utilized to help smokers quit and maintain
abstinence.
- Smoking cessation promotion is cost-effective when NRT products
are used. NRT combined with face-to-face or telephone counseling is
more cost-effective compared to NRT or counseling alone; therefore,
the combination should be promoted when economically feasible.
- As a viable, effective and cost-effective treatment, NRT should
be available and affordable for general sale (over-the-counter,
OTC).
- Smoking cessation services should be made available above all
to population groups with higher prevalence of tobacco use (e.g.
low income groups, the less educated, those diagnosed with mental
illness). Such a focus would reduce the disparities in health
attributable to tobacco use. Interventions must be tailored to
reach high-risk populations, including pregnant women, youth who
use tobacco, itinerant workers, language minorities, those mentally
ill, and other groups for which recruitment into cessation programs
is a special challenge. In light of the obstacle that longer
smoking duration poses to successful cessation, programs to prevent
uptake and to prompt early cessation are crucial.
- Research should continue on factors affecting cessation among
youth, the costs and cost-effectiveness of smoking cessation
interventions as well as of cessation interventions for
non-cigarette forms of tobacco (smokeless tobacco, cigar or pipe
smoking).
- Given the very limited research on the economics of smoking
cessation, development of adequate surveillance systems should be a
priority and research and evaluation should be included as key
elements.
- Simple briefs outlining the social and economic benefits of
smoking cessation should be prepared and disseminated among
political decision-makers to promote understanding and to support
the drafting and implementation of strong public policies and
effective public health strategies.
|