|
|
|
|
| Tell us what you think
|
|
|
| Home
|
|
|
Demographics and Health Effects Key findings, Recommendations, Slide kit
|
|
|
Efficacy Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research, Slide kit
|
|
|
Health Economics Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research
|
|
|
Policy Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research, Slide kit
|
|
|
Safety Key findings, Recommendations, Areas for further research, Slide kit
|
|
|
| Resource library
|
|
|
| Useful organisations
|
|
|
| About Us
|
|
|
|
|

Offering free NRT through a state tobacco quitline may increase
quitline utilization and quit rates.Call volume to a state tobacco quitline increased from 2,351 calls per
month, or 78 calls per day, before the availability of free NRT, to
3,606 calls per month, or 188 calls per day, following the availability
of free NRT (p<0.0001). 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6
months among all quitline callers increased from 10.3% (95% confidence
interval (CI) 9.7 to 10.9) before the availability of free NRT to 14.9%
(95% CI 14.3 to 15.5) after the availability of free NRT. An Oregon
program doubled registered calls to quitlines and increased quitting
fourfold.- Tinkelman D, Wilson SM, Willett J, Sweeney CT.
Offering free NRT through a tobacco quitline: impact on utilization and
quit rates. Tob Control 2007;16(Suppl 1):i42-i46
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/search?andorexactfulltext=and&resourcetype=1&disp_type=&sortspec=relevance&author1=tinkelman&fulltext=&volume=&firstpage=
- Fellows, JL, Bush T, McAfee T, Dickerson J. Cost
effectiveness of the Oregon quitline "free patch initiative". Tob
Control 2007;16(Suppl 1 ):i47-i52.
http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/cgi/search?sendit=Search&pubdate_year=&volume=&firstpage=&DOI=&author1=fellows&author2=bush&title=oregon&andorexacttitle=and&titleabstract=&andorexacttitleabs=and&fulltext=&andorexactfulltext=and
|