|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Tobacco control policies increase motivation to quit and number of quit attempts.Tobacco control interventions include bans or restrictions on
smoking in workplaces and other areas, increased taxation of
tobacco products and implementation of media campaigns. The
evidence for the impact of these and other population based
approaches on smoking behaviour is based on a wider range of
evidence than randomized trials alone. The review by the Task Force
on Community Preventive Services included studies with appropriate
designs and found consistent evidence from more than one
well-designed study that smoking restrictions or bans reduced
consumption, and that smoking bans led to higher quit rates. Hopkins DP, Briss PA, Ricard CJ, et al. Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 16-66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Strategies for reducing exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, increasing tobacco-use cessation, and reducing initiation in communities and health-care systems. A report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR. 2000; 49: 1-11. Chaloupka FJ. Macro-social influences: the effects of prices and tobacco-control policies on the demand for tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999; 1: S105-S109. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Response to increases in cigarette prices by race/ethnicity, income, and age groups - United States, 1976-1993. MMWR. 1998; 47: 605-609. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cigarette smoking before and after an excise tax increase and antismoking campaign - Massachusetts, 1990-1996. MMWR. 1996; 45: 966-970. Pierce
JP, Gilpin EA, Emery SL, et al. Has the California tobacco
control program reduced smoking? J Am Med Assoc. 1998; 280:
893-899. |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||